<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Bucco Beyond</title>
      <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/</link>
      <description>Commentary from a far-flung Pirates fan</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2007</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:44:17 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.0</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <item>
         <title>Trip to Bradenton</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><img alt="spring-training.jpg" src="http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/spring-training.jpg" width="400" height="533" /></p>

<p>This week, I can finally cross another thing off my "Things to Do Before I Die" list, I took a trip to Bradenton, Florida to check out the Pirates Spring Training. I was able to weasel a couple of extra days out of a business trip to Tampa for some baseball. The result? I had a fantastic time. The weather was beautiful and I was able to squeeze quite a bit into the two days I had in town.</p>

<p>I may post some commentary later, but in the meantime check out the <a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/trigger25/sets/1109497/">photo gallery</a> of the shots I took down there. I was able to take a bunch of shots from the Pirates/Devil Rays game at McKechnie Field on March 8th, as well as my two short visits to Pirate City on March 8th and 9th. Enjoy the shots!</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000273.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000273.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 08:44:17 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Work in Progress</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>After much procrastination, I am finally getting around to updating the look of this site. The old layout was always considered the "beta" version -- just to get things up and running. A re-design was supposed to be implemented long ago, but life kept getting in the way. Now the design is done, I just have to get it to work. Normally, this wouldn't be difficult, but I upgraded Movable Type (my blog "engine") since I first started this blog and I have much learning to do to make everything work right. To this end, this site will be undergoing many changes as I tinker with the system in prepartation for the new design. Please be patient. Hopefully, I can get back to baseball sooner rather than later.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000221.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000221.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 11 Jun 2006 20:47:13 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Batman Smells (Something Fishy)</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>As the Bucco faithful were reeling from the team's disappointing opening week, a caped crusader swooped it to shed light on what he considered the organization's top problem -- frugal ownership. Robinson native, Michael Keaton <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06100/681044-100.stm">blasted</a> the Pirate ownership in a press conference before he threw out the first pitch in the team's home opener:</p>

<blockquote>I fear they will take advantage of the good will of the people who continue to show up," he continued. "For my money, that's disrespectful. At some point, you either have to write the check or do something and not assume, well, we're OK and, ultimately, the franchise is valuable, anyway</blockquote>

<p>Wow. Batman has beaten a number of formidable foes over the years, but turning the tide on the Bucs' 13 consecutive losing seasons may be too much for even him.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000217.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000217.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2006 07:02:47 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Oh, The Humanity</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>It's that time once again for my official fearless predictions for the upcoming season. Or, if perhaps you remember my <a href="http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000132.html">predictions</a> from last season, "clueless" may be a better word for what follows than "fearless." Last year, I threw some longshot picks in the mix to make things interesting (Seattle?! What was I thinking). This year's picks are more straightforward (and as a result, probably equally off-base). Nevertheless, onward into the breach:</p>

<p><b>AMERICAN LEAGUE</b></p>

<p><b>East</b><br />
New York Yankees <br />
Boston Red Sox <br />
Toronto Blue Jays <br />
Tampa Bay Devil Rays <br />
Baltimore Orioles </p>

<p><b>Central</b><br />
Chicago White Sox<br />
Cleveland Indians<br />
Minnesota Twins<br />
Detroit Tigers<br />
Kansas City Royals</p>

<p><b>West</b><br />
Los Angeles Angels<br />
Oakland Athletics<br />
Seattle Mariners<br />
Texas Rangers</p>

<p><br />
<b>MVP</b>  Vladimir Guerrero<br />
<b>Cy Young</b>  Rich Harden<br />
<b>Rookie of the Year</b>  Ian Kinsler<br />
<b>Manager of the Year</b>  Joe Torre</p>

<p></p>

<p><br />
<b>NATIONAL LEAGUE</b></p>

<p><b>East</b><br />
Atlanta Braves<br />
Philadelphia Phillies<br />
New York Mets <br />
Washington Nationals<br />
Florida Marlins</p>

<p><b>Central</b><br />
St. Louis Cardinals<br />
Houston Astros <br />
Chicago Cubs<br />
Milwaukee Brewers<br />
Cincinnati Reds<br />
Pittsburgh Pirates</p>

<p><b>West</b><br />
San Diego Padres<br />
Los Angeles Dodgers <br />
San Francisco Giants <br />
Arizona Diamondbacks <br />
Colorado Rockies </p>

<p><b>MVP</b>  Albert Pujols<br />
<b>Cy Young</b>  Jake Peavy<br />
<b>Rookie of the Year</b>  Ryan Zimmerman<br />
<b>Manager of the Year</b> Bobby Cox</p>

<p><br />
<b>POSTSEASON</b></p>

<p><b>ALDS</b> White Sox over Yankees<br />
<b>ALDS</b> Angels over Red Sox<br />
<b>ALCS</b> Angels over White Sox</p>

<p><b>NLDS</b> Cardinals over Dodgers<br />
<b>NLDS</b> Braves over Astros<br />
<b>NLCS</b> Cardinals over Braves</p>

<p><b>World Series</b> Angels over Cardinals</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000215.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000215.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 20:26:31 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>DK Sizes Up the Organization</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Pirate beat reporter Dejan Kovacevic posts his <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06092/678757-63.stm">take</a> on the state of the Bucco organization in today's <i>Post-Gazette</i>. Aside from some minor quibbles (Duffy a building block?), I think DK did a very good job of summing up where the Bucs are and why. He offers a more even-handed take on some of the organization's problems that I've been recently harping on -- namely the current talent gap in the minor league system and the recent poor draft crops. Of particular interest is the <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06092/678750-63.stm">section</a> on the organization's international signings. </p>

<p>Also of interest is the topic of the team's recent veteran stopgap spending spree:</p>

<blockquote>One argument against such spending is that this money, if funneled instead to the developmental level, would create an immense pool for signing amateurs.</blockquote>

<blockquote>"With a team like Pittsburgh, that's what I'd be doing," one National League executive said. "At the lower levels, they can compete financially with anyone. Not in the bigs. You're just throwing the money away instead of continuing to build."</blockquote>

<p>Couldn't have said it better myself. Once the season kicks off, I'll be rooting for every player in a Pirates' uniform, but the acquisitions of Sean Casey, Jeromy Burnitz, Joe Randa and Roberto Hernandez still leave a bad taste in my mouth. It doesn't matter if the team breaks the .500 barrier if there is no foundation for continuing success. </p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000213.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000213.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:58:58 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>BA Dishes Bucs</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
Baseball America's Chris Kline sits down with Pirates farm director Brian Graham in the latest edition of Klines' <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/features/060322pirates.html" target="_blank">Spring Training Dish</a>. Nothing too illuminating here, but I was interested to see Graham dodge the issue of the system's lack of impact bat. I've been harping on this all winter and I was hoping Graham would at least address it a manner that gave me some glimpse of hope that the organization had plans to address this. Instead we get some nonsense about not being able to truly evaluate a player's potential until he's been in the bigs for a couple of years. It's true that propects often fail to live up to lofty projections. That's part of the game. Most of the guys pinpointed to be impact bats often don't realize that potential. But some do. And it is more common for a player with that "impact tag" to become an impact player than a player without to become one. And aside from Andrew McCutchen and Neil Walker, there are no players even close to earning that tag. And that's a huge failing of this organization.
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000212.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000212.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 23 Mar 2006 07:15:43 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Hardball Questions</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>
Check out Bucco blogger<a href="http://www.bucsdugout.com/" target="_blank"> Charlie Wilmouth's</a> dead-on preview of the Pirates' season over at the <a href="http://www.hardballtimes.com/main/article/five-questions-pittsburgh-pirates1/" target="_blank">Hardball Times.</a> Charlie does a good job of laying out the key issues for the team this upcoming season, including the questionable impact of the incoming veterans, the uncertain performance of oliver perez and the pressure facing the young pitching staff. A good read.
</p><p>
While I agree with most, if not all, of Charlie's points, I still can't help feeling optimistic about the upcoming season. I have no logical reasons for my optimism, nor do I expect any miracles this season. No, my optimism is the kind of blind optimism that most baseball fans feel this time of year. The optimism of limitless possibilities. Of course, it's all nonsense. Deep down, I don't expect this team to do much to abate the downward spiral the orgainization has been in. No matter. I intend to wallow in my optimism for the time being. It won't be long before the bitter reality comes crashing back in.
</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000211.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000211.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Mon, 20 Mar 2006 19:15:05 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Gammons Likes the Bucs</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>In a recent <a href="http://insider.espn.go.com/mlb/gammons/story?id=2328555">ESPN column</a> (registration required), Peter Gammons highlighted the six teams to watch this year. The Pirates were listed second. Gammons points to the team's young pitching (guided by new pitching coach Jim Colbrun), improved depth and the development of youngsters like Jose Castillo, Ryan Doumit and Chris Duffy as promising signs of improvement. I don't particularly share Mr. Gammons' rosy view of the Bucs' prospects this season, but it is always nice to see the team get some love from the media. It remains to be seen if they can back it up.</p>

<p>In the same column, Gammons polled over 50 executives, managers, coaches and scouts on several questions. Mike Gonzalez ranked seventh among those players thought to be the most likely to breakout this year (Jose Castillo received an honorable mention). Oliver Perez and Kip Wells received honorable mention for those players most likely to have the biggest comeback this year.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000208.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000208.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:12:29 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>The Big Empty</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Here's further proof of the depressing state of the farm system -- On Deck Baseball Prospects has uploaded it's <a href="http://www.ondeckbaseball.com/pirates.html">ratings</a> of the Bucco's system. Scroll to the bottom to see the Pirates' Top 40 Prospects. </p>

<p>As I mentioned in an earlier <a href="http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000190.html">post</a> this off-season, I am somewhat alarmed by the lack of depth in the organization. The talent falls of rather quickly after blue chippers Andrew McCutchen and Neil Walker. Small market teams can't sustain success without a steady stream of talent coming up through the system and the Bucs just don't have it right now.</p>

<p>How did this happen? Bad luck? Poor scouting? Those things surely played a part, but I see the problem as mostly a philosophical one. The organization has displayed tendencies time and time again that are counter-productive to maintaining a good farm system. Take the draft for instance. The front office has approached the draft as it were actually split into two separate parts. The Pirates seem to place utmost importance on the first round (which is not entirely unreasonable), but then they seem to view the rest of the draft as merely an opportunity to fill organizational needs with players of limited upside. How else can you explain drafting limited players like Taber Lee and Brian Bixler so early in the draft. This year they wasted a second round pick on Brad Corley (who by all accounts would've lasted another couple of rounds) when a polished hitter like Stephen Head was still on the board. Look, draft failures are common. There are no givens in the draft. But it's almost criminal the way the Pirates treat the draft after the first round.</p>

<p>The other philosophical problem comes in how the Bucs acquire talent through trades. The Pirates have traded off a decent amount of talent over the last four years, and in some cases they have severely hampered themselves by always insisting on "major league-ready" players. Under normal circumstances, I would generally agree that "major league-ready" players are preferable to players in the lower minors. The best example of this kind of deal is the deal that sent Brian Giles to San Diego for Oliver Perez, Jason Bay and Cory Stewart. Perez had some major league experience but had yet to establish himself. Bay was the classic "major league-ready" player. He was a talented player trapped at AAA who was clearly ready for a major league role. However, this kind of situation isn't always available. And when the market isn't going to bear an acceptable "major league-ready" player, a general manager must be creative enough to get some kind of talent in return. Littlefield has not shown this kind of creativity. Instead of insisting on "major-league ready" players for a guy like Kris Benson, Littlefield should have changed course and looked for younger players with higher upside (albeit with higher risk). Aramis Ramirez, Kris Benson and Jason Kendall have all been shipped out without anything to show for it. Other players were kept only to walk away with nothing to show for it later. You just can't bleed talent like this and no expect to succeed.</p>

<p>Take a look at a team like the Indians. They are a young team on the rise. However, unlike a team like the Twins, much of the Indians' young talent originally came from other organizations. Grady Sizemore, Coco Crisp, Travis Hafner, Jake Westbrook and Cliff Lee all came in "fire-sale" type deals. The Indians have replenished their organization by plucking young talent from organizations hungry for their departing veterans. The Bucs have not been able to do that and it shows.</p>

<p>The Pirates have made some noise this off-season by bringing in veterans like Sean Casey, Jeromy Burnitz and Joe Randa. And yet, most, if not all, of these players will be gone after this season. And then what? It is a bit hard to send in the next wave, when the well is dry.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000203.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000203.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:01:16 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Let&apos;s Take it Easy Here, People</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>I'm as excited about the future of Zack Duke as the next guy, but I'd just wish everyone would temper their enthusiasm a bit. It just seems that every time the guy's name is mentioned, it is accompanied with an excessive amount of hyperbole. Take this DK <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/06011/635793.stm">report</a> from today's <i>Post-Gazette</i> on the team's upcoming minicamp, for example. It speculates on the possibility of Duke being named opening day starter.</p>

<p>I'm not trying to pee on anyone's parade, but I get increasingly uneasy the more the hype grows. I believe that one of the toughest feats in major league baseball is for a young pitcher to successfully establish himself. To say that Duke took the first step in that process last year would be a huge understatement. He was simply fantastic. But he's not there yet, and it is entirely possible that he will take a step backwards before he takes another step forward.</p>

<p>All I am saying is that the guy has only 14 starts under his belt. It is not going to do him or anyone else any good to put undue pressure on him while he gets his major league feet under him. Let's back off the guy and let him do his thing. Odds are, there will be time enough in his career to lavish him with the appropriate accolades and kudos.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000199.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000199.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:02:27 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Closing Time</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Baseball's winter meetings are proving to be rather interesting, with the Bucs making a couple of moves. I'm going to wait until the meetings end and the dust settles before I weigh in on those moves, but the <a href="http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/05342/619052.stm">write-up</a> of the Mark Redman deal by DK from this morning's PPG has compelled me to make with the clicky clicky. </p>

<p>According to the article, Dave Littlefield, said his next target is to find a reliever with major league experience closing out games. For God's sake, WHY?! Consider the fact that none of these "proven" closers are really that proven. Let's face facts. Braden Looper, Roberto Hernandez and Antonio Alfonseca are not really going to put fear in the heart of too many opposing teams. Why throw money at mediocrity? Especially when the team has a number of holes to fill?</p>

<p>Unless you have a stud closer (of which, there are very few), it just doesn't make sense to go after these types of guys. If you want a mediocre closer, why not just create one by finding a guy on the scrap heap? Sound far-fetched? It's not, really. The Brewers have displayed a talent for doing just this the last couple of years. First, they come up with Dan Kolb. Then, after shipping him out (and bringing in value for a guy that previously had none), they come up with Derrick Turnbow. Heck, even the world champion Chicago White Sox came up with Bobby Jenks, who had never closed before. These types of experiments are not always successful, but the investment is negligible. </p>

<p>In recent interviews, Littlefield has indicated that Mike Gonzalez and Salomon Torres will get looks at the closer role. Gonzalez has been the organization's heir apparent for the role for the last several years. I think Ian Snell also could excel in the role.  These guys should have a chance to win the role. </p>

<p>I say, invite some intriguing guys to camp, and throw the role up for grabs. The closer role isn't the missing ingredient that's keeping this team from contending. Come on, let's get creative here. Don't throw some of the organization's limited resources at players with limited value.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000192.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000192.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 06:40:15 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>State of the System</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p><i>Baseball America</i> weighs in on the <a href="http://www.baseballamerica.com/today/features/05top10s/pirates.html">Bucs' top 10 prospects</a> today. Aside from curiosity of who would be number one (Walker or McCutchen), the list also illuminates a huge problem that is lingering just over the horizon. </p>

<p>Much has been said and written about the current glut of major league ready youngsters the Pirates have at their disposal. However, I am very concerned about where the next wave is coming from. Granted, Walker and McCutchen are two very nice chips to have on your side and I look forward to following their ascent up the organizational ladder. However, two prospects does not a system make, and right now the system looks very thin behind those two guys. </p>

<p>Sure, the outlook of things could change if a handful of guystake a huge leap forward in their development, but as of now, it don't look good. A sign of a good system is one that can produce a pipeline of talent, not just a one-time geyser. Littlefield is in the final year of his contract and I believe his fate should not be tied to the success or failure of the big league club, but whether he can turnaround the downward spiral of the farm system. Otherwise, the organization is just likely to remain on the treadmill of futility it has found it's self on.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000190.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000190.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2005 11:38:09 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>More Bucco Prospect Stuff</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Wilbur Miller's excellent <a href="http://users.rcn.com/wtmiller/pirateprofiles.htm">Pirate Player Profiles</a> has moved to a new location and been updated. Mr. Miller's site offers a no-nonsense look at the Bucs system and is one of the better resources for information on the Buccos of tomorrow (as well as those who will never be). Check it out.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000180.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000180.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 10:42:38 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Sound off on Bucco Prospects</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>My good friend Scott Rex over at On Deck Baseball Prospects has <a href="http://www.ondeckbaseball.com/archives/000504.html">asked</a> his readers (scroll down) to weigh in with their picks for the top prospects in the Pirates' system. Take a few minutes to weigh in with your responses.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000179.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000179.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 06:50:03 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Let the Offseason Begin!</title>
         <description><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations to the Chicago White Sox for clinching their first championship since the days of Shoeless Joe Jackson. When the final out was recorded last night, the offseason will now begin in earnest. </p>

<p>The Bucs have some work to do this offseason. There will be some big decisions to make. Youth has been served and it will be interesting to see whose stock will rise and fall through their performance in the Winter Leagues. Some veterans will likely be sent packing, most notably potential arbritration casualties Kip Wells and Craig Wilson. I'm sure there will be no lack of things to talk about. </p>

<p>I've been somewhat lax on my commentary of late (as I have been most of the season). I started a post on the Tracy hiring several times in the last couple of weeks, but scrapped 'em all. I hope to get my act together and post some thoughts on it in the coming weeks.</p>]]></description>
         <link>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000176.html</link>
         <guid>http://www.funkycheese.net/bucco/archives/000176.html</guid>
         <category></category>
         <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 06:55:06 -0500</pubDate>
      </item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>
